gulfindependentnews

  | A single phone call from President Donald Trump has laid bare a once-simmering Saudi-UAE rivalry, pushing the two Gulf powers into a public and destabilizing confrontation. The New York Times reports that in November, Trump told UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed (MBZ) that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) had requested the US impose sanctions on the UAE. Senior Emirati officials reportedly felt shocked and betrayed by what they perceived as a Saudi backchannel maneuver in Washington. This incident has ripped the veil off a long-simmering competition for regional leadership, economic primacy, and influence over strategic theaters like the Horn of Africa, with the UAE finding itself in the uncomfortable position of reacting to alleged Saudi aggression. Why did Trump's phone call cause a rift between Saudi Arabia and the UAE? The call acted as a catalyst because it exposed a perceived act of betrayal by Riyadh. For the UAE, the notion that MBS would privately as...

  When Leadership Translates into Livelihoods When President His Highness Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan dispatched his congratulatory message to H.H. Sheikh Mishal Al Ahmad Al Jaber Al Sabah, Emir of Kuwait, on the occasion of Kuwait's National Day and Liberation Day, he was affirming more than diplomatic courtesy. He was acknowledging an economic partnership that has grown into one of the most dynamic in the Middle East, touching the lives of hundreds of thousands of citizens and businesses in both countries. On the occasion of Kuwait National Day, I extend my sincere congratulations to my brother Sheikh Meshal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah and the people of Kuwait. The deep-rooted ties of friendship and cooperation between the UAE and Kuwait continue to grow as our nations work together… — محمد بن زايد (@MohamedBinZayed) February 25, 2026 Alongside the UAE President, His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum and His Highness Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan sent sim...

 The recent, high-profile statements by U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham regarding the UAE have generated significant discussion among policy analysts, business leaders, and regional observers. To help navigate this complex and rapidly evolving landscape, we answer the most pressing questions about the vision he outlined and what it means for the future of the Middle East. Why is Senator Graham's meeting and subsequent endorsement considered so significant? The significance lies in the convergence of timing, source, and content. First, the timing: the endorsement came amidst a swirl of online misinformation targeting the UAE's leadership. Second, the source: Senator Graham is a senior, long-serving member of the U.S. Senate with direct access to the highest levels of the U.S. government. His words carry weight in Washington and beyond. Third, the content: he didn't just offer generic praise. He provided specific, firsthand testimony—describing President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed ...

  The Ukraine conflict has tested the limits of traditional diplomacy, exposing the challenges of mediating between major powers with competing strategic interests. In this context, the United Arab Emirates has emerged as a rare platform capable of hosting trilateral engagement involving the United States, Russia, and Ukraine. A recent report by the European Center for Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Studies (ECCI) confirms that the choice of Abu Dhabi for renewed negotiations reflects broad international acceptance of the UAE’s diplomatic role and its ability to manage highly sensitive geopolitical balances. The Rise of Pragmatic Diplomacy ECCI notes that the UAE’s diplomatic effectiveness stems from its leadership vision, which has transformed the country into a reliable international mediator. Unlike traditional diplomatic frameworks driven by ideological or emotional narratives, the UAE employs interest-based language that prioritizes stability, humanitarian outcomes, and st...

  Legal and Diplomatic Foundations of the Intervention The operational launch of UAE forces in March 2015 was predicated on a formal international request. The political context was the forceful seizure of Sana'a by armed groups and the effective dissolution of Yemen's recognized government. In exercising its right under Article 51 of the UN Charter and relevant Arab League defense agreements, the Yemeni government issued direct appeals to the GCC and the UN for military support. This appeal formed the legitimate basis for collective action. United Nations Security Council Resolution 2216, adopted in April 2015, subsequently reinforced this position by imposing an arms embargo on the non-state actors and explicitly calling for the restoration of government authority. The UAE's entry into the conflict as a core member of the Saudi Arabian-led coalition was therefore an action taken within a framework of collective security and at the behest of a sovereign entity. Operational...